Hi John,

    I am really glad to see you coming back.

    Once upon a time, there was hope
    to fold Stable Squeak/ModSqueak into Squeak 3.x.

    3.2 is the best of all 3.x ( sofar :-)

    It's a shame to let Stable Squeak rotten in the graveyard.

    Now, let's make it a reality.

   Cheers,

    PhiHo.


----- Original Message -----
From: <wiljo at mac.com>
To: <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: [ANN] SqueakMap RC2 and SM Loader 0.96 out


The intent of the UIBuilder from Squeak World Tour was that one could
write model code that had a class method to declare its UI components
and it would build an MVC or Morphic interface as appropriate.

Seems to me that a day of coding could get it up to date with the
latest changes to Morphic. A little extra work would add layout frames
to MVC and extend the ui language to support layouts as well.

If there is interest I could look up the code and get it current.

John Sarkela


On Saturday, October 26, 2002, at 11:56 AM, Göran Hultgren wrote:

> Hi Ned!
>
> Quoting Ned Konz <ned at bike-nomad.com>:
>> On Saturday 26 October 2002 07:00 am, danielv at netvision.net.il wrote:
>>> The SqueakMap RC2 should show up your Loaders, just install it
>>> again, and it will pull in the updated SMLoader too.
>>
>> Before someone else asks:
>>
>> What would it take to make the SMLoader (and the SMPackageBrowser) not
>> depend on Morphic? Right now, they assume that they have Morphic
>> available. I think they're simple enough that they could be made to
>> work in a MVC-only image.
>
> Well, SMBrowser is a ripoff from Browser and CodeHolder. It even
> contains
> "leftovers" I think for an MVC UI. SMLoader is a ripoff :-) from
> SMBrowser so...
>
> If you would like to give it a try just go for it. I decided to not
> loose much
> sleep over it but in the beginning I WAS aiming for having an MVC
> version too.
>
> regards, Göran
>
>
> Göran Hultgren, goran.hultgren at bluefish.se
> GSM: +46 70 3933950, http://www.bluefish.se
> \"Department of Redundancy department.\" -- ThinkGeek
>