I know. I use Morphic Wrapper but I think that a more traditionnally=
=20
looking inspector without satellite
(that I hate) and having type in the air is good too.

Stef




On jeudi, septembre 5, 2002, at 04:56  AM, Lex Spoon wrote:

> Stephane Ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
>
>
>>>> At ESUG, we got a presentation of F-script (a scripting and Smal=
ltalk
>>>> language with APL like vector manipulations). Philippe the F-Scr=
ipt
>>>> father
>>>> implemented a ***really*** interesting inspector called object=
=20
>>>> inspector.
>>>>
>>>> The idea is that this behavioral inspector does not show the ins=
tance=20
>>>> of
>>>> object, but offers all the methods, when we click on a method it=
 get
>>>> executed on this object and the result is put on the right. When
>>>> selecting
>>>> this new object the method it understand are again displayed on =
his
>>>> right.
>
> Sounds kinda like MorphicWrappers, incidentally.  You don't need a
> special inspector for MW -- all morphs can do it all the time.  To
> handle arguments, you drag the argument morphs on top of the receiv=
er.
>
>
> -Lex
>
>
Dr. St=E9phane DUCASSE (ducasse at iam.unibe.ch)=20
http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~ducasse/
  "if you knew today was your last day on earth, what would you do
  different? ... especially if, by doing something different, today
  might not be your last day on earth" Calvin&Hobbes