Modules ? (Re: Squeak book !)
Karl Ramberg
squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
Sun Sep 15 07:48:42 UTC 2002
danielv at netvision.net.il wrote:
>
> Hey, Bruce, you're writing from the future too now? ;-)
>
> Seriously now, seeing as we're sort of choked with the modules system as
> it exists in 3.3a, we should consider in my opinion doing one more round
> of "modularizing modules", and start separating out pieces of code from
> the image, based on the 3.2 code.
I'm not at all up to date with the modules...
Could you give a brief explanation of the problems with the 3.3a stuff?
> Of course any work we do on this will be compatible with (and even more
> useful in the context of) the future module system modus operandi.
>
> If people think this is a good way to go, I have some ideas on how we
> can make progress in this direction.
A brief explanation here, too.
Karl
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|