Actually, since my fix was *very* naive, I hesitated to post it as a [FIX].  Probably good to do, though, to give the bug more visibility..

Thanks for the friendly help, Doug.  

Cheers,
Brent

-----Original Message-----
From:	Doug Way [mailto:dway at riskmetrics.com]
Sent:	Wed 4/2/2003 6:49 PM
To:	The general-purpose Squeak developers list
Cc:	
Subject:	Re: [BUG ] Weakness weakness in 3.6alpha ClassBuilder ( [cd][et]   verynaive fix )

I notice you replied with a fix to your bug report with the same subject line
and a comment between parentheses.

The only problem is that this keeps your fix on the SQBUGS (bug reports) page,
not the SQFIXES where it should be.  Probably you should just post a new
message (or reply) with [FIX] in the subject line instead, so that it shows up
on SQFIXES.  I guess you would lose the connection to the original bug report,
but that's okay.

See both pages:

http://swiki.gsug.org:8080/SQBUGS/
http://swiki.gsug.org:8080/SQFIXES/

- Doug Way



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 3183 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20030402/10635c59/attachment.bin