I didn't take offense at all. When I create stuff, it's obvious to me
that other people with different perspectives may find it "differently"
cool ( ;-), and their perspectives may help make it better.

I would love to hear yours, but in detail, since a general statement
doesn't carry the information needed. Be specific.

BTW, there are also other package loaders, like the Categorical SM
PackageLoader. You might want to browse around, and either switch, or
see what you like better about each, and maybe combine, or whatever.

Have fun.

Daniel

Marco Paga <mail at marco-paga.de> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi.
> Sorry, it wasn't meant offending at all. I was just puzzled about how things 
> go on in the PackageLoader. After all it makes sense to me.
> I will think about it (I know that you did it before, too.) What you did is 
> great work.  I think that the ui could be improved that pie-sized brained 
> people won't get puzzled.
> 
> regards
> marco
> 
> On Friday 04 April 2003 19:34, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> > No, no no. "more user friendly" just doesn't cut it. Are you quite sure
> > a different logical rule will cause no more confusion? do you have a
> > concrete suggestion or at least a specific direction for the new layout
> > you want?
> >
> > I'm not being arbitrarily difficult here - I already gave it my best
> > shot at making it user friendly. I realize that you may see thing
> > differently, but I won't be enlightened by "more user friendly".
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > Marco Paga <mail at marco-paga.de> wrote:
> > > I got what you mean, but should the filter for all installed packages
> > > "overlay" in some way the other filter for new versions? perhaps changing
> > > the layout of th epackage loader a bit to be a bit more user firendly.
> > >
> > > marco
> > >
> > > On Friday 04 April 2003 15:01, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> > > > You are. Browsing the code can dissipate worlds of anxiety (though it
> > > > might take some looking to find the right thing to browse).
> > > >
> > > > SMLoader>>packageList
> > > >
> > > > 	^(self packages) select: [:e | self filter allSatisfy: [:currFilter |
> > > >
> > > > 		(self perform: currFilter) value: e]]
> > > >
> > > > You can see the filter definitions in the "filters" category of the
> > > > same class.
> > > >
> > > > Daniel
> > > >
> > > > Marco Paga <mail at marco-paga.de> wrote:
> > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmm. I really don't understand one option: "display new or newer
> > > > > packages". I had to use this together with the option: "display
> > > > > installed packages". Showing just installed packages should show me
> > > > > the SPrevayler package if it is on my system no matter the other
> > > > > option (whatever it should mean), or am i missing a very important
> > > > > point?
> > > > >
> > > > > regards
> > > > > marco
> > > > >
> > > > > On Friday 04 April 2003 09:51, goran.hultgren at bluefish.se wrote:
> > > > > > Marco Paga <mail at marco-paga.de> wrote:
> > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thursday 03 April 2003 16:24, Marcus Denker wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 04:14:32PM +0200, Marco Paga wrote:
> > > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > > > > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > sorry but: nope, I can't see it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Maybe this is because you use 3.4gamma? The Package loader
> > > > > > > > only shows the packages that are registerd for specific
> > > > > > > > versions (in this case 3.4, 3.5, 3.6). Maybe 3.4gamma is
> > > > > > > > not recognized as 3.4?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > it must be the package loader of 3.4gamma. I worked aorund with
> > > > > > > every possible configuration, but my package seems not to be
> > > > > > > there.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Eh, are you sure? I mean, *really* sure? :-) The reason I ask is
> > > > > > because I see it but I *did* have to look for it - since it is
> > > > > > called "SPrevayler" instead of "Sprevayler" it sorts itself right
> > > > > > after "SM Package Loader".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards, Göran
> > > > >
> > > > > - --
> > > > > Marco Paga, mail at marco-paga.de , http://www.marco-paga.de
> > > > > GnuPG Key ID: 0xCD8E7612
> > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > > > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
> > > > >
> > > > > iD8DBQE+jWxqlI77o82OdhIRAoMMAJ9WkFfGdLV8JvymjuwFh8IoUynEkACg0DPy
> > > > > MNHQMg6y1INZicY0H0lHZYg=
> > > > > =7jvq
> > > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >
> > > --
> > > Marco Paga, mail at marco-paga.de , http://www.marco-paga.de
> > > GnuPG Key ID: 0xCD8E7612
> 
> - -- 
> Marco Paga, mail at marco-paga.de , http://www.marco-paga.de
> GnuPG Key ID: 0xCD8E7612
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE+jb/TlI77o82OdhIRAhVhAKDEziXsGOQ+4H8CUKN9TEHMULD/IACdHjmf
> WIBXzFeYAK0HQpZTPMmFEKs=
> =xtuJ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----