Monticello status
Avi Bryant
avi at beta4.com
Mon Apr 7 07:32:40 UTC 2003
On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Stephane Ducasse wrote:
> (Class
> (name #Array)
> (superclass #ArrayedCollection)
> (type #indexed)
> ( .....
> )
>
> (InstanceVariable
> (name bounds)
> (belongsTo Morph)
> )
>
> (Method
> (name fullBounds)
> (belongsTo Morph)
> (code "fullBounds
> ^ bounds")
> )
>
> I do not see why this model would not work for versioning.
No, I don't either. And, in fact, the current Monticello file format is
extremely similar, but uses #storeOn: strings instead, like this:
MCClassDeclaration
name: #Foo
superClassName: #Object
category: '...'
instVarNames: #('x' 'y')
comment: ''!
MCMethodDeclaration
className: #Foo
selector: #fullBounds
category: 'accessing'
timeStamp: '...'
source: 'fullBounds
^ bounds'!
Is that the kind of thing you think would be useful?
Avi
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|