[Various things]
Ok.

Avi Bryant <avi at beta4.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> > - Specifically with the RB, it seemed that some class extension methods
> > appeared as differences (but not conflicts). I don't notice anything
> > special about these methods. Any ideas? do you see this too?
> 
> Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean.  Can you elaborate?

I loaded the RB from SM. Fixed various KCP issues. Then loaded MC, then
loaded the previous RB .mcv. I got warned about spurious conflicts,
proceeded.

Then the conflict list included the expected changes, as conflicts, and
also some class extensions - stuff that hadn't changed at all. These
showed up as regular list items - not marked as conflicts, and I had no
choice to reject them or not. Are these the spurious conflicts? these
seem too spurious - it is the same code. And they're not conflicts. I'm
probably missing something here...

Daniel