On Wednesday 13 August 2003 11:59 pm, Stephane Ducasse wrote:

> I was nearly finished to move all the none namespace related method
> into a SmalltalkImage class, and I would like to understand. Are
> you saying that all the mechanisms around MemoryHogs is just there
> but never used?

This is a framework. How can you say it's not used by a package?

For instance, the BFAV *should* use this mechanism, as it can hang on 
to huge quantities of data (15Mb or so in my image).

-- 
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com
GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE