[Morphic] About worlds

Karl Ramberg karl.ramberg at chello.se
Sat Aug 16 19:35:52 UTC 2003



Andreas Raab wrote:
> 
> When we are in Morphic we generally assume that there is some "world"
> describing the overall context of some Morphic environment. Let's ignore the
> particular idiosyncraties of worlds for the moment (such as world state,
> stepping etc) and let's just presume that the world is some container that
> effectively denotes the root of some morphic tree.
> 
> Once we start working with pretty much any morph "for real" we basically
> always assume that the morph has some associated "home" (the world) which
> defines the environment. 

I like this. But there are some questions.
Which world would own the hand ? And which world would a morph being transfered
from one world to another live in ? A transfer world ?

Karl



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list