Sublicensing
Jack Johnson
fragment at nas.com
Tue Aug 19 16:02:19 UTC 2003
goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:
> But since I haven't been able to even raise one single little concern
> with you Andreas I don't think there is any point for me to continue
> this thread. You don't see any problem whatsoever with contributors
> adding clauses. I do. We are obviously just stuck here. Now I am waiting
> for someone else to chime in or I am dropping it, it is just a waste of
> time.
(Maybe it is just a waste of time)
Again, I think that maybe separating out the idea of the image and the
VM (and, I suppose, maybe the plugins) might be a good thing.
For instance:
"You don't see any problem whatsoever with contributors adding clauses.
I do."
Contributors to what? The base image? The VM? A new plugin?
It may be that your answer to all three scenarios is the same, but if
not, you might want to look at *why* not and where that might either be:
- a new bone of contention, or
- an area of consensus
-Jack
P.S.
What if *Apple* wanted to add a clause?
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|