Method Annotations
Avi Bryant
avi at beta4.com
Wed Aug 20 23:19:49 UTC 2003
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Michael Rueger wrote:
> It would be absolutely valuable to have additional information
> associated with a method, but nothing that is active in any sense of the
> word.
I agree with you about not wanting the information to be active - but do
you see that as a problem with the goodie I posted? In which way?
Is the version Andreas posted any better, from your point of view?
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|