[GOODIE] Method Annotations
Roel Wuyts
wuyts at iam.unibe.ch
Fri Aug 22 04:15:43 UTC 2003
Yes, that was what I was aiming at.
Nice link.
On Friday, Aug 22, 2003, at 01:29 Europe/Zurich, Richard A. O'Keefe
wrote:
> Roel Wuyts <wuyts at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> - why it has to be *IN* the method. Like Craig and Michael mentioned,
> you could also keep them someplace else, associated with the method.
> This is what I did with my type things: I keep them in a dictionary
> somewhere, with the CompiledMethod as key (CompiledMethods are around
> anyway :-) ). You coud even file such things out as doIts without too
> much trouble (to remain lightweight). But again, I think it depends on
> what you want to do.
>
> I would direct people's attention to Annotea (the link will be found
> near
> the top of the list on the left of the http://www.w3.org/ home page).
> The point is that
> "annotation X is *visible* in the code when browsing"
> and
> "annotation X is *stored* in the code"
> are different and independent propositions.
>
>
Roel Wuyts Software
Composition Group
roel.wuyts at iam.unibe.ch University of Bern,
Switzerland
http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~wuyts/
Board Member of the European Smalltalk User Group: www.esug.org
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|