[KCP] new initialize pattern
Andreas Raab
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Sun Aug 24 22:33:24 UTC 2003
> I just uploaded the change set to generalize the use of the
> new-initialize pattern.
Great, but where?
Cheers,
- Andreas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On
> Behalf Of Serge Stinckwich
> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 8:45 PM
> To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> Subject: [KCP] new initialize pattern
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Noury got some email problems, so i forward his message to the list.
>
> ----- Message transféré de bouraqadi at ensm-douai.fr -----
> Date : Sun, 24 Aug 2003 18:27:16 +0200
> De : bouraqadi at ensm-douai.fr
> Sujet : [KCP]new initialize pattern
>
> Hi,
>
> I just uploaded the change set to generalize the use of the
> new-initialize
> pattern. This makes every object answer the initialize message (empty
> method
> hold by Object). The new and new: methods hold by Behavior
> are redefined
> to
> send the initialize message to every new instance.
> I also removed all other redefinition of new or new: that
> does the same
> job.
>
> In order to evaluate the effect of this change on performance I run
> macrobenchmark on my laptop PIII 1.2GH with 256MB RAM. Here are the
> result I
> got.
>
> -Before loading the change set: #(6187 68898 21508 9724 0 7097 7097)
>
> -After loading the change set: #(6683 70241 21210 10757 0 6815 6815).
>
> -Percentages of After/Below: #(108 101 98 110 - 96 96)
>
> When percentage are less than 100, they mean that the change improve
> performance.
>
> Noury
>
>
> --
> Serge Stinckwich -< )
> Université de Caen>CNRS UMR 6072>GREYC>MAD /~\
> http://www.iutc3.unicaen.fr/serge/ (/ |
> Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)] _|_/
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|