About Flow in Squeak 3.X [Was Re: Any good ideas for FileNames?]
ducasse
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Tue Dec 2 08:35:00 UTC 2003
Hi craig
do you have a plan to get a smooth integration of Flow (meaning slowly
deprecate the current stream)?
If I remember old discussions people were afraid of big bang changes.
However it would be good to
start to thing how flow could become a good replacement of Stream.
What are your current plans? I'm not expert in Streams so does anybody
expertise on Flow and stream comment?
Stef
On Mardi, déc 2, 2003, at 09:04 Europe/Zurich, Craig Latta wrote:
>
> Hi--
>
> The next version of Flow has a complete URI implementation, and
> filename support is implemented with it. I've been dealing with files
> as
> URLs for several years now, and found that it works well.
>
>
> -C
>
> --
> Craig Latta
> http://netjam.org/resume
> craig at netjam.org
> [|] Proceed for Truth!
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|