[OT] C++ and Smalltalk fun

Tim Rowledge tim at sumeru.stanford.edu
Thu Dec 4 18:35:48 UTC 2003


"Thomas A Petersen" <tpeterse at csc.com> wrote:

> I looked upon Smalltalk with some skepticism because it is interpreted
No, it isn't. It's compiled. The compiled code may be executed by
simulation, interpretation, custom hardware or translation to other
formats but none of that makes the language 'interpreted'. Unless I
suppose one chooses to be very nit-picky and claim that machine code is
interpreted by the instruction decoder section ofa cpu.

tim
--
Tim Rowledge, tim at sumeru.stanford.edu, http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim
Useful random insult:- On permanent leave of absence from his senses.



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list