>> Aaron J Reichow wrote:
>> >
>> > > > 2. The format for specifying a message is Class>>#message ; that 
>> is your
>> > > > message should have read Morph>>#delete.
>> > >
>> > > Really?  I use #delete to talk about the message, but Morph>>delete to
>> > > talk about a particular method.
>> >
>> > The convention is to use the #.  It's kind of neat actually-  do a
>> > print-it on "Morph>>#delete" in a workspace- the CompiledMethod for that
>> > method is returned.  #delete can be passed (a symbol), and delete 
>> cannot.
>>
>> Yes, "Morph>>#delete" is a valid Smalltalk expression and
> 
>> "Morph>>delete" is not. 

Actually, the convention is to use "Object>>selector" without the hash 
mark. This can be verified by selecting ">>" and pressing Ctrl-E.

Now, in 1999 some guy decided it would be neat if this *was* valid 
Smalltalk and added #>> to Behavior as a shortcut for 
#compiledMethodAt:. Of course, this requires you to use a Symbol as 
parameter, hence the #. Maybe we should punish him for that? And remove 
the method? Bad boy, me, bad, bad boy ...

-- 
    Bert