according to http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3491
we want to have ansi compatibility in... should I have a look at that?

Stef


On 7 déc. 03, at 04:40, Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:

>   Thank you, Stéphane,
>
>>>   What I would like Doug and Guides to do is to freeze the update for
>>> a moment so that I can make a compatible version with the latest
>>> alpha.  Otherwise, every little conflict beats me and it would never
>>> get merged.
>>
>> My point of view is the following:
>> Ok we should do the same as with babel. Decide when we want to 
>> introduce
>> m17n, give it more priority, commit it and check.
>>
>> Now other people should agree on that.
>
>   Good.
>
>> So the most important point is when do you have the time to do that
>> because
>> we may have problems once it gets in and then having you available
>> could be important.
>
>   This is very unfortunate timing.  Not this week, probably around the
> end of the year?
>
>>>   And, please do use the latest m17n package even if you don't need
>>> any of extended characters.  The change is supposed to be more or 
>>> less
>>> transparent for the 7-bit character set users.  For 8-bit users, it
>>> isn't exactly...
>>
>> What is the size of the changes?
>> Can other people review it? Diego? Andreas? Doug? Marcus?
>
>   Again, the package is on the web.  You can unzip it and read it.
> The all change sets are about 1.5MB.  Not all of this are methods that
> represents real 'changes'.  It includes the biggish tables (~ 360K),
> and trivial re-write of methods with 8-bit chars (~ 200K) in .sources
> file.  Also the changes superseded by Babel (~ 80K) doesn't have to be
> there.
>
>   Thank you again,
>
> -- Yoshiki
>
>