"Andreas Raab" <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:

> Something is very, very odd here. I really don't understand why we'd either
> want or have to go to the source file for finding the defining class for
> some method.
Nor me. This is clearly a bad failure of code reviewing in a crucial
area. What if the sources are missing/non-connected ?

tim
--
Tim Rowledge, tim at sumeru.stanford.edu, http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim
Don't be sexist; broads hate that!