About test presence
ducasse
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Sat Dec 20 07:43:15 UTC 2003
On 20 déc. 03, at 04:15, Colin Putney wrote:
>
> On Dec 19, 2003, at 12:58 AM, ducasse wrote:
>
>> Hi colin
>>
>> for me I just would like to have some consistency:
>> knowing how to name the testCase according to the class name
>> for Integer having IntegerTest
>> and for the category the same as the class but with tests
>>
>> After if people wants more we can discuss. For now I would like to
>> have tests testing the current
>> image much present and regular because regularity is related to
>> beauty when this is well defined.
>>
>> Stef
>
> I'm all for consistency, as long as it doesn't impose a structure on
> my tests. I'd like to be able, for example, to add tests for floating
> point math and rename the fixture ArithmeticTest if that made sense.
>
> How about a convention that TestCase subclasses be named XyzTest where
> Xyz is a descriptive name which could be, but doesn't have to be, the
> name of a class being tested. Similarly, test cases should be in
> categories which end with '-Test'.
>
> Would that be sufficiently consistent?
yes
The idea of a convention is to know when we want to break it :))
But at least for 99% of the case I just do not have to think.
>
> Colin
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|