>
> Scanner and Parser are pretty stable as is and don't really need to be
> generated using SmallCC, although it would be nice to use it so we can
> have a flexible grammar.  The important thing is the ParseNodes, which
> are independent of which parser we use.  I have refactored them so
> hopefully they are more useful then the previous ones (the new ones are
> subclasses of ParseNode2).

Hi anthony I image that your scanner is better however when I see SmaCC 
I really like
the result and the possibility to change the syntax in no time.

Stef