semaphores do not access like volatile
Ned Konz
ned at bike-nomad.com
Fri Feb 14 04:27:15 UTC 2003
On Thursday 13 February 2003 12:18 pm, Lex Spoon wrote:
> PS -- people who have been here very long, know that I truly think
> you should get rid of the threads altogether! You really need tool
> support to do it better than a single-threaded support.
Hey, I made a Process Browser... what more do you want? <g>
> The
> initial extra complexity from the single-threaded version, is
> usually dwarfed by the complexities of synchronizing multiple
> threads.
Strict message passing semantics helps. I agree that semaphores and
shared variables are tricky. As long as you don't have to share
resources, each thread can live in its own world.
--
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com
GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|