On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 00:16, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> That's great. I think it would still be a good idea to come to them
> concretely with an alternative license or a plea to transfer all
> interest to an appropriate foundation (maybe the german squeak group
> could be a temporary holding place for it). 
> 
My feeling of the consensus about the SqueakL is that people are
generally happy with it. So, iff Apple comes back to me indicating
they're willing to negotiate, I think that 'fixing' the SqueakL is the
simplest thing that could possibly work. We've identified the three
clauses, I can send them an image that is Apple font free, and there is
alternative wording in the APSL for the other two clauses. 

Of course, I think APSL relicensing would be acceptable as well, but
they already indicated that this is unlikely to happen as the APSL is
meant for their active projects.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20030222/7078172c/attachment.pgp