I apologize, Andreas, I should have asked you first.. 

Software Composition Group guys, does one of you want to be the
maintainer?

-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Raab [mailto:andreas.raab at gmx.de]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:49 AM
To: 'The general-purpose Squeak developers list'
Subject: RE: ClassBuilder fix, SqueakMap, and releasing 3.4


Brent,

I would appreciate if you could take me out as the "maintainer" at
SqueakMap. I'm not going to maintain any of this in honest. If you'd
like to
be the maintainer of a suite of tests for ClassBuilder feel free to add
yourself.

Cheers,
  - Andreas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org 
> [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On 
> Behalf Of Brent Vukmer
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 2:40 PM
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> Subject: RE: ClassBuilder fix, SqueakMap, and releasing 3.4
> 
> 
> BTW, I installed the MetaClassBuilderFix SAR in a 3.4gamma 
> image, installed the ClassBuilder test suite, and then ran 
> the ClassBuilder test suite -- 3 out of 3 tests passed.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brent Vukmer 
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:32 AM
> To: Squeak-Dev (E-mail)
> Subject: ClassBuilder fix, SqueakMap, and releasing 3.4
> 
> 
> Andreas's fix for the ClassBuilder bug is now on SqueakMap.  
> So is the suite of unit tests that Andreas created to test 
> ClassBuilder.  
> 
> On the docs side, I've created the following chain of Swiki pages: 
> "Documentation"->"Known Bugs"->"Known Bugs in 3.4"->"Adding 
> instVar to ClassDescription breaks ClassBuilder"
> 
> We have SqueakMap fix-love and Swiki documentation-love for 
> the bug.  Let's roll with the 3.4 release.
> 
> Cheers,
> Brent
> 
> 
> 
> 
>