Safari & squeakland plugin on os-x?

Michael Rueger m.rueger at
Wed Jan 15 01:32:11 UTC 2003

John M McIntosh wrote:
 > Yes, that would be one way to do it.

That's great, as it would largely eliminate the need to maintain two 
different VMs (standalone, plugin) on the Mac (in the future).

 > Mmm one could try Apple's os9 MP thread logic, that maps to pthreads,
 > but again a bit of thinking.

Me thinks we should put the OS-9 plugin VM into legacy maintenance mode: 
support the current working set of browsers, no additional effort to 
make it work in new ones.


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list