Safari & squeakland plugin on os-x?
m.rueger at acm.org
Wed Jan 15 01:32:11 UTC 2003
John M McIntosh wrote:
> Yes, that would be one way to do it.
That's great, as it would largely eliminate the need to maintain two
different VMs (standalone, plugin) on the Mac (in the future).
> Mmm one could try Apple's os9 MP thread logic, that maps to pthreads,
> but again a bit of thinking.
Me thinks we should put the OS-9 plugin VM into legacy maintenance mode:
support the current working set of browsers, no additional effort to
make it work in new ones.
More information about the Squeak-dev