On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, at 03:02 AM, Robert Withers wrote:

>
> On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, at 02:54 AM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
>
>>> [license]  I must be able to release under the SqueakL
>>
>> WHY??? Due to an unfortunate technicality, SqueakL is not 
>> open-source. I
>> STRONGLY recommend using an open source license that's 
>> link-compatible with
>> both SqueakL and Mozilla. PLEASE.


Mark,  what's wrong with the SqueakL?

thanks,
rob