[e-lang] Re: Comments on Lex's "Object as Capabilities in Squeak"

cg at cdegroot.com cg at cdegroot.com
Thu Jan 30 19:43:33 UTC 2003


Mark S. Miller <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org> said:
>I can't say for certain which of these two cases is the better analogy to 
>the task we face with Squeak, but I sadly suspect it's much more like the Java 
>situation.
>
Why? Squeak's flexibility is closer to Scheme's than to Java. My gut
feeling is that it's doable. Maybe with some syntax additions, but
nothing really big.

-- 
Cees de Groot               http://www.cdegroot.com     <cg at cdegroot.com>
GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD  1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B
Cogito ergo evigilo



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list