Squeak 3.6 distributions names (was Re: Should SUnit be part of Basic?)

Joshua 'Schwa' Gargus schwa at cc.gatech.edu
Tue Jul 1 00:48:40 UTC 2003


On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:34:44PM +0200, nbo at ensm-douai.fr wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This thread makes me remember a discussion I had with somebody about Squeak
> distribution names. If I rember well, the plan is to have two distributions a
> big one with all/most of packages/modules/projects and a small one.

Actually, three (eventually): Minimal, Basic, and Full.

> That's fine for me. My point here is about naming. I think that the full image
> should be the one to be downloaded by newbies or people that just want to
> discover what is Squeak. This is why I think it should be named "default".

I actually like the other names better, as they are more descriptive than "default".

Joshua

> 
> Noury
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------
> This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> 
> 



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list