On Tuesday 01 July 2003 01:07 am, Roel Wuyts wrote:

> I am browsing a bit through Squeak code, and encountered the
> following thing which surprised me...
>
> Quite some code (for browsers for example) makes dependents of
> morphs. But since a Morph is not a Model, these dependents are all
> kept in the DependentFields class variable on Object. My question
> is simply: why is Morph not a Model?

Browsers, etc. are derived from MorphicModel, which has a "model" 
instVar.

-- 
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com
GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE