Ned Konz wrote:

>On Wednesday 02 July 2003 10:22 am, Ned Konz wrote:
>  
>
>>No, I think that the change sets that I posted should replace the
>>others. I have tried loading those two original change sets and
>>there were still problems.
>>    
>>
>
>OK, they now seem to load reasonably.
>
>However, they contained a few errors and omissions, which are fixed in 
>the CS I just posted.
>

Ok, I'll look at these.

- Doug Way