3.6a - SystemNavigation instance?
Ingo Hohmann
ingo at 2b1.de
Mon Jul 7 09:15:00 UTC 2003
Hi Stephane,
creating 'throw away' objects seems very strange to me.
I guess what _I_ would like most from a usage point of view would be to
have class side methods, so that it wouldn't look so much different from
the usage of the Smalltalk variable ... (of course that's just me newbie ;-)
But having SystemNavigation default, and it being documented, would
work, for me, too.
Stephane Ducasse wrote:
> Hi ingo
>
> for now SystemNavigation new works.
That's what I did, but with the feeling "Oh well, it works, I will find
out how to do it right later"
> To check why browse the class SystemNavigation, clcik on the class
> button and look on the instance creation protocol.
>
> Now a deeper answer, this is true that I'm not really satisfied to have
> to create an instance all the time, so
> I do not know what the other think but turning SystemNavigation into a
> singleton for now could be good.
> SystemNavigation default could work well
Ingo
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|