On Thursday 10 July 2003 06:57 pm, tblanchard at mac.com wrote:
> Oh, this is something I've always wanted  to ask - so the
> squeakland VM is pretty much the same as the squeak vm (although
> packaged as a plugin) - its only the base image thats really
> different - so I could run a regular squeak 3.5 image with the
> squeakland vm and should have no troubles with it?

Sure.

But there may be some changes or fixes that may have gotten into the 
Squeakland update stream since the last time that Michael submitted 
those changes for 3.4 (?).

The 3.5 image should be more or less a superset of the Squeakland 
image.

-- 
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com
GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE