> 
> Incidentally, there are bug databases floating around 
> already.  Probably the best thing for us to do would be to 
> set up an existing program on bugs.squeakfoundation.org and 
> just use it, customizing it over time for our purposes.
> 

Good point.  I agree that a mailing list is probably not the best
back-end for a bug database ( or any database, really :) ).  Although,
it seemed to me that the biggest priority was to get a tool working in
Squeak that made it easy for people to get dive into the existing
process.

> Unless, of course, you really do want to put in the month or 
> more of effort required to build a decent bug tracking 
> system.  

Heh.  

> In that case, by all means don't let me stop you.  
> :)  You still might want to browse around at what other 
> systems do, though.
> 

True.  Do you have specific features in mind?