Brent Vukmer wrote:
>>Well we don't want to have a file in the DAV repository 
>>because it needs to always reflect the contents of the directory.  
> 
> 
> I didn't literally mean a file would be stored in the repository -- just
> that the GET request should return a text/plain MIMEDocument...

Ah, then I absolutely agree... or there should be a PROPFIND for it or 
something.  The problem is that when a non-dav client does a GET request 
on a collection, it's nicer to see HTML with links than to see text... sigh

Julian