On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Julian Fitzell wrote:

> Oh, I'm not faulting your suggestion - it may actually be the only
> solution.  I'm just proclaiming that to be a flaw with the DAV protocol,
> if that is the case.  Personally, I'm intending to start work on a
> slightly heavier-weight server using XMLRPC that will actually handle
> sending out commit emails, tagging versions, etc.  We aren't convinced
> at work that a DAV server will scale to meet our needs (not that it
> shouldn't exist - just that it won't be the only option).

I wonder if might be nicer to build this on top of HTTP rather than
XML-RPC?  Just a more sophisticated webserver, that sends out
notifications on PUTs, provides fine grained access control, etc (and
happens to know that its documents are always going to be Monticello
versions).

Just a thought...