On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Stephen Pair wrote:

> Well, then why not use KomServices?  I would cetainly not object to its
> inclusion in the base image either.

Weren't you were going to get rid of the dependency on dynamic bindings?
Then it would just be three simple classes, and I would lobby to bring
them into the image (or, more properly, into the Network package, which
hasn't been separated from the image yet ;).

Avi