>
Hi michael

this is really a pity that you cannot make it for ESUG. we could have 
talk about cool stuff.

> And because of the evaluation overhead involved in the current chunk 
> format I wouldn't be sure if a carefully design XML based format 
> wouldn't even be faster to parse than the chunk format.

You are certainly right especially when you look at the ***MESS*** in 
squeak related to fileout and file in.

Stef