Hmm, another stupid question by me again: where can I find these things 
to review (like Ned's changeset)? I am aware that I should actually 
know this (part of being a good citizen), but a reminder would do no 
harm :-)

On Wednesday, Jul 30, 2003, at 22:22 Europe/Zurich, Marcus Denker wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 09:50:16AM -0700, Ned Konz wrote:
>> On Wednesday 30 July 2003 09:32 am, Roel Wuyts wrote:
>>> So who is up for doing this? It is so simple that I will put the
>>> code of the method here in this mail :-)
>>
>> I just posted a CS with a fix for this same problem, as well as
>> another related problem.
>>
> But that won't help to get it approved... it would have been better
> to sent an evaluation of Roel's code. Then I would have [approved]
> this. And because Roel would be glad about your evaluation, he in
> turn would have reviewed your change, and in turn I would have approved
> that.
>
> But nothing like that happend. We now have, instead of two approved
> fixes, one big not approved fix. And this will stay so until someone
> reviews it.
>
> The idea of the harvesting-process was to have a process that is 
> parallel:
> Any non-parallel process can't scale. Just look at the bugfix-archive:
> There's lots of stuff that really should have been part of 3.6... but 
> nobody
> reviewed them.
>
>       Marcus
>
> -- 
> Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de  -- Squeak! http://squeak.de
>
>
Roel Wuyts                                                   Software 
Composition Group
roel.wuyts at iam.unibe.ch                       University of Bern, 
Switzerland
http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~wuyts/
Board Member of the European Smalltalk User Group: www.esug.org