Daniel Vainsencher wrote:

>...
>I would definitely love to see you and Adam work out how to come up with
>one core Celeste that has the best features of both, maintained by one
>person. ...
>
Yep.  Also, if a newly improved FilteringCeleste ends up being the one 
that the Celeste community wants to use as the officially recommended 
version, we can change things so that FilteringCeleste is part of the 
"Full" image release.  Mostly, this would just mean that the "Upgrade to 
Full" package would be changed to include FilteringCeleste instead of 
Celeste.  (Although realistically, whichever one is chosen should 
probably just have the simple name "Celeste".)

- Doug Way