Yes that makes a lot of sense. 

But how about just a [closed] tag, with the description specifying
whether it was rejected, forwarded, a repeated fix... seems to me
there're a lot of scenarios, and little difference in the handling.

Daniel

Marcus Denker <marcus at ira.uka.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 02:05:49PM +0200, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> > Were'nt you the guy that wanted to remove tags to simplify a couple of
> > weeks ago? ;-)
> > 
> Yes, but this was without having a tool (With the comment-notepad 
> there is no need to remember all those tags...).  ;-)
> 
> The idea with [forwarded] and [closed] would be that the archiveviewer
> would filter those away, so you'd only see those messages that need
> additional work.
> 
>         Marcus
> 
> -- 
> Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de  -- Squeak! http://squeak.de