Ned's right.  Sean, the conventions for commenting on
bugs/fixes/enhancements are described in detail on the Swiki at 
http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3103

The BugFixArchive-Model implementation follows those conventions.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ned Konz [mailto:ned at bike-nomad.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:00 PM
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> Subject: Re: harvesting posts
> 
> 
> On Thursday 05 June 2003 08:55 am, Sean Charles wrote:
> > > These posts are getting automatically processed by the Bug Fixes 
> > > Archive. See http://swiki.gsug.org/sqfixes ... or install the 
> > > BugFixArchiveViewer from SqueakMap.
> >
> > But where is the *content*, explain ....somewhat confused 
> at *what* is 
> > being processed given that your messages have basically nothing in 
> > them.. I small a tag, < .. .. >, come on, let us all in on 
> it! Or at 
> > least me!
> 
> I *think* what's being processed is the Subject: and From: lines.
> 
> The Subject: line contains harvesting tags (in this case 
> [cd][er][et][sm]) as well as the title of the original [FIX].
> 
> The From: line is of course used to distinguish who said it.
> 
> The body of the message would contain comments, if any.
> 
> -- 
> Ned Konz
> http://bike-nomad.com
> GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE
> 
> 
>