Can we mark updates as such, after the fact? (Was:RE: [ENH][KCP] KCP-0007-pullUpIsMeta-ab-sd ([closed] --allreadyincluded))

Sun Jun 8 17:17:28 UTC 2003

On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:08:47AM -0400, Brent Vukmer wrote:
> Doug --
> 
> Is it OK if we mark these [ENH][KCP]|[MCP] posts that have already been converted to updates, as such?  If so...
> 
> Marcus --
> 
> It is so cool that you are rockin' like a hurricane in the archives!  I would love it if you marked posts like these with updatestream-number information.
> Either "[closed] -- included as update #123456" or "[update - 123456]", depending on what Doug thinks is the best way to mark it.
> 
Ok, I'l use [closed] with the update-number from now on. ("update" and
"approved" are reverved for use by the Harvesters, IMHO. actually, it
should be theirs to decide what's closed and what's not, but with that
big baglog I took the liberty to just doit...)

  Marcus

-- 
Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de  -- Squeak! http://squeak.de