On using the bugfixarchive tool

Brent Vukmer bvukmer at blackboard.com
Wed Jun 11 12:04:40 UTC 2003


Hey Tim.  Thanks for the feedback.  Your comments are regarding the CommentNotePad app UI make sense.  Is there a button Morph that stays down after being pressed? If so, I'll swap in buttons in place of the current check-box list.

I'm planning to get rid of most of the tiny-menu options.  The summary comments and the QA-tag buttons/check-box list will go in the main window.  Also I'll put a pane at the bottom for listing attachments. 

Right now "the developers" is just me :)  I have a couple of other loading/sorting/filtering issues to resolve; when those are tested I'll release the next minor version and then go to work on the CommentNotePad.

I'd like to get these UI changes made this weekend but I am crazy busy at work right now.  So if anyone out there wants to pitch in and submit an improved CommentNotePad along the lines of Tim and Daniel's recent comments -- feel free!  

-----Original Message-----
From:	Tim Rowledge [mailto:tim at sumeru.stanford.edu]
Sent:	Tue 6/10/2003 9:51 PM
To:	squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
Cc:	
Subject:	On using the bugfixarchive tool
I've just installed this tool for the first time and have a few
suggestions for the developers.

First - great idea!

The UI needs a bunch of work. Using the 'mini-menu' is tedious. Buttons!
Exactly the sort of thing buttons were made for. Please include all the
needed tags. The summary editor ought to be a simple text field. The
name(s) of attachment(s) should be shown in a little (preferably
selectable) list at the bottom.

Attachment reading - could someone please take a look and see what the
name of the attachment file in
email-file-repository/swiki.gsug.org/sqfixes/3378-attachments is? It
_should_ be 2003-06-05 (simulator fixes).zip but came out on my machine
as just 2003-06-05 and the string in the image was '2003-06-05{char 32}
(simulator{char 97}fixes).zip which seems a bit odd. I suspect that
somewhere I need to do more badChar checking.

Email formatting - see apparent complaint in mailheader attached to my
first mail:-
>  Delivered-To: mailman-squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> Received: (qmail 25868 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2003 00:54:18 -0000
> Received: from sccrmhc13.attbi.com (204.127.202.64)
>   by mail.theinternetone.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2003 00:54:18 -0000
> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 00:54:12 +0000 (GMT)
> X-Comment: Sending client does not conform to RFC822 minimum requirements
> X-Comment: Date has been added by Maillennium
> Received: from aSqueakSystem
Looks like the mail code needs a few changes.

tim
--
Tim Rowledge, tim at sumeru.stanford.edu, http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim
Logic is neither an art or a science but a dodge.




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 3984 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20030611/77b80de8/attachment.bin


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list