Daniel Vainsencher wrote:

>If you're overwriting the update, then you might as well put the code in
>Socket class>>initialize, instead of a do it, so that
>unloading/reloading it will do the right thing.
>  
>

Oops, too late.  I'd rather not overwrite the update again, but we could 
still add a [FIX] to add that to Socket class>>initialize if that seems 
like the right thing to do.  (And it seems like the right thing to me.)

- Doug Way