Fun article
PhiHo Hoang
phiho.hoang at rogers.com
Fri Jun 13 15:23:51 UTC 2003
Steve Dekorte wrote:
> >
> > http://www.cs.inf.ethz.ch/~muller/PieterMuller.pdf
>
> They seem to be using the term "active object" for what languages like
> Act1 and ACBL/1 call "actor". Is "active object" the proper term? I'm
> not faulting them for their choice of terms. I'd just like to know the
> proper term to use myself.
>
You might want to read page 11 (Chapter 2, Active Object Concepts),
then visit:
http://www.lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon
Cheers,
PhiHo.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|