[KCP] SystemDictionary cleaning: Comments and design
Richard A. O'Keefe
ok at cs.otago.ac.nz
Mon Jun 16 01:08:09 UTC 2003
Daniel Vainsencher <danielv at netvision.net.il> wrote:
There is a problem with all these schemes that use code as
signs, which is that as far as automated analysis goes, this
makes SystemDictionary dependent on all those classes, and
preserves the mess we're trying to get rid of in the first place.
Why do you think I proposed putting this information in a *comment*?
Yes, "sources with it" is slow, but looking these things up is not going
to be a high frequency operation, so it doesn't matter.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|