FramerateMorph reports a lot slower in 3.5 & 3.6 than it does in3.4

Glenn Ehrlich glenn.ehrlich.lists at cox.net
Sun Jun 22 21:22:23 UTC 2003


That was it.  Thanks!

Bob Arning wrote:

> On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 13:54:29 -0700 Glenn Ehrlich <glenn.ehrlich.lists at cox.net> wrote:
> 
>>However, FrameRateMorph reports very different results:
>>
>>image FrameRateMorph
>>3.6   20 mSecs (50 frames/sec)
>>3.5   20 mSecs (50 frames/sec)
>>3.4   2 mSecs (500 frames/sec)
>>
>>As you can see, vastly different.
> 
> 
> Glenn,
> 
> Look at the performance section of preferences and see if "higherPerformance" is set in your 3.4 image and not in the others.
> 
> Cheers,
> Bob
> 



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list