FramerateMorph reports a lot slower in 3.5 & 3.6 than it does
in3.4
Glenn Ehrlich
glenn.ehrlich.lists at cox.net
Sun Jun 22 21:22:23 UTC 2003
That was it. Thanks!
Bob Arning wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 13:54:29 -0700 Glenn Ehrlich <glenn.ehrlich.lists at cox.net> wrote:
>
>>However, FrameRateMorph reports very different results:
>>
>>image FrameRateMorph
>>3.6 20 mSecs (50 frames/sec)
>>3.5 20 mSecs (50 frames/sec)
>>3.4 2 mSecs (500 frames/sec)
>>
>>As you can see, vastly different.
>
>
> Glenn,
>
> Look at the performance section of preferences and see if "higherPerformance" is set in your 3.4 image and not in the others.
>
> Cheers,
> Bob
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|