Doug Way wrote:

> 2. Replace the 9 network rewrite changesets with 1 combined changeset 
> and 8 dummy changesets as Joshua suggested.  This would fix the 

That would be the safest one.

> problem.  (Assuming there are no order dependencies in the changesets, 

There *are* order dependencies, especially with the remove and recompile 
change sets.

> which I think is the case.)  However, this has the slightly unsettling 
> effect that some 3.6alpha users will have different changeset contents 
> than others.  Although the resulting source code in the image should be 
> the same, so it's not really a big deal.  Or,

I don't think it's a big deal, only a tiny fraction of people would even 
closely look at single change set.

By doing this we could then also announce an "all clear to update" for 
people like Jimmie who have been hesitant to update.

Michael