I don't see what's so smiley about it - about the first thing I thought
when I saw Jabbers two layer protocol was "hmm, that should be nicer to
write to than sockets...". 

XML is slightly harder for humans to write in a telnet console than some
protocols, but much easier to machine-read and edit later... So why not?

Daniel

Avi Bryant <avi at beta4.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> 
> > Ah, I got it. Thought I got the problem a couple of seconds after
> > sending, but I missed the aspect that it spreads.
> >
> > BTW, does Monticello still include some kind of repository that's not
> > CVS?
> 
> We're working on it...
> 
> And given some of the conversations today, I'm really tempted to layer its
> network protocol on top of Jabber. ;)
> 
> Avi