[FIX] Scamper-Form Submit-umur ([sm][cd][et])
Umur at Writeme
umur at writeme.com
Thu Jun 26 13:01:30 UTC 2003
Thanks for the comments. $? is there because of the method "argString:".
And that method is being called in many places. We certainly need to
change that method instead of removing the $? later.
We need to go through all senders of "argString:". While thinking about
it, I see many opportunities for refactoring the class HttpSocket.
Anyway, I did not want to create too many changes before seeing the
networking rewrite.
Umur
-----Original Message-----
From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
[mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of
goran.krampe at bluefish.se
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 11:36 PM
To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
Subject: Re: [FIX] Scamper-Form Submit-umur ([sm][cd])
"Lex Spoon" <lex at cc.gatech.edu> wrote:
> Woohoo!
>
> More specifically: :)
>
> 1. Getting rid of the $? for POST's is certainly desired. A big "duh"
> for it being there to begin with.
>
> 2.The POST not handling redirections is a big deal. Great work.
>
> 3. The TextInput fix looks great.
>
>
> I have briefly tested it and it works fine. That is as high of a
> standard as the code we currently have. :)
>
> Incidentally, this kind of fix may well become moot when Michael
> Rueger finishes his networking rewrite, correct? Anyway, it is good
> to have this working.
Definitely good. I will try Scamper on the new SM web UI btw and help
fixing it so that it works. Btw, the network rewrite has gone into
3.6alpha. I am not sure Michael has any more outstanding issues in it.
> Lex
regards, Göran
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|