Searching a small squeak image still able to read scripts

Stephane Ducasse ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Thu Jun 26 18:40:03 UTC 2003


Hi romain

I know that alex also produced a VM plugging to print on the std-ouput.
This can be interested for you too.

Stef

By the way, you could use SmallWiki because long time ago we had a
nice visitor producing latex directly. It should not take time to redo 
it.



On Wednesday, June 25, 2003, at 05:23 PM, rrobbes wrote:

> Well the title says it all ...
> I'm writing a small app which does a bit of text processing
> in squeak (i'm way too lazy to use LaTeX for a long time,
> so I did a kind of swiki syntax and a code generator to do
> the work for me).
> So i've wrapped everything inside a small shell script
> which calls squeak in headless mode, does the job, then quits.
> But the image used is quite big as it the one used to
> develop the thing. So I wonder if anyone has a small squeak
> image still able to read scripts given from the command line
> (a while ago there was a link to Dan Ingall's small.image, which
> I tried, but it seems to be unable to process scripts.
> I might be wrong, since I didn't search for long, so i'll
> be glad if you have a workaround using this image).
>
>   Thanks in advance,
>       Romain Robbes
>



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list